Dismiss Notice
We would like to remind you that we’re updating our login process for all 3CX forums whereby you will be able to login with the same credentials you use for the Partner or Customer Portal. Click here to read more.

3CX running SIP on different port than 5060

Discussion in '3CX Phone System - General' started by synologic, Sep 24, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. synologic

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    i have a free install of 3CX running on a port other than 5060, specifically 5063. There's no technical reason for this since the system runs on a closed network. It also appears that running on 5060 it works just fine.

    The problem i encounter, is that from time to time, i get Not Acceptable Here error when calling from an outside number to a local number, with a very strange reason:

    24-09-2012 18:00:48.533 [MS105000] C:210.2: No RTP packets were received:remoteAddr=192.168.0.128:21372,extAddr=0.0.0.0:0,localAddr=192.168.0.30:7432
    24-09-2012 18:00:46.830 [CM503007]: Call(C:210): Extn:102 has joined, contact <sip:102@192.168.0.128:5063>
    24-09-2012 18:00:46.830 Leg L:210.2[Extn] is terminated: Cause: 200 BYE from PBX
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.486 Leg L:210.1[Line:10002<<NUMBER_REMOVED] is terminated: Cause: 200 BYE from PBX
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.439 [CM503020]: Call(C:210): Normal call termination. Call originator: Line:10002<<NUMBER_REMOVED. Reason: Terminated
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.439 [CM503016]: Call(C:210): Attempt to reach <sip:102@192.168.0.30:5063> from Line:10002<<NUMBER_REMOVED has failed. Reason: Not Acceptable HereReason Unknown
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.095 [CM503025]: Call(C:210): Calling T:Extn:102@[Dev:sip:102@192.168.0.128:5063]
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.064 [CM503027]: Call(C:210): From: Line:10002<<NUMBER_REMOVED ("NUMBER_REMOVED" <sip:NUMBER_REMOVED@192.168.0.110:5063>) to T:Extn:102@[Dev:sip:102@192.168.0.128:5063]
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.064 [CM503004]: Call(C:210): Route 1: T:Extn:102@[Dev:sip:102@192.168.0.128:5063]
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.064 [CM505003]: Provider:[NUMBER_REMOVED] Device info: Device Not Identified: User Agent not matched; Capabilities:[reinvite, replaces, able-no-sdp, recvonly] UserAgent: [Sippy] PBX contact: [sip:NUMBER_REMOVED@IP_REMOVED:5063]
    24-09-2012 18:00:45.064 [CM503001]: Call(C:210): Incoming call from Line:10002<<NUMBER_REMOVED to <sip:102@192.168.0.30:5063>
    24-09-2012 18:00:44.783 [CM503012]: Inbound office hours rule (unnamed) for 10002 forwards to DN:102

    It seems the call fails because the PBX receives Ringing message from the terminal being called :)

    Since switching back to 5060 the problem seems resolved, this is not a critical issue, however, changing the SIP port might prove useful someday depending on the setups.

    Anybody has any insight on this issue ?

    Regards,
    Viorel
     
  2. SY

    SY Well-Known Member
    3CX Support

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think that SIP port is related to the problem
    What is the "terminal" (102) where from this "ringing" comes?
    Initiator is Sippy, it is obvious ;)

    Verbose log can explain situation, if you need we can check it together
    Use code ctag for logs.
    Regards :)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. synologic

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just a quick reply since there will be a few days since i can take 3CX down and provide verbose logging, 102 is a phone (chinese unknown brand).

    The call path is from outside number (sip provider) -> ring group -> extension (single extension in the ring group).
    It only happens when i put the sip port on 5063, honestly i haven't tried other ports since i had to put the system back up.

    If there's any other tests you have in mind, please let me know, i will take down the system in the weekend and test / provide logs.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.