Dismiss Notice
We would like to remind you that we’re updating our login process for all 3CX forums whereby you will be able to login with the same credentials you use for the Partner or Customer Portal. Click here to read more.

Outgoing rule is not handled correctly

Discussion in '3CX Phone System - General' started by 3cxisti, Feb 18, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 3cxisti

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    I have a outgoing rule für mobile number beginning with "+" (eg. +49179....)

    If I call this number the outgoing rule is not mached and the call is not forwarded to the correct trunk.

    What can be the reason?

    This is my outgoing rule:
    +49151,+49152,+49157,+49159,+49160,+49162,+49163,+49170,+49171,+49172,+49173,+49174,+49175,+49176,+49177,+49178,+49179

    On the top of the rule-list. It is set that the first "+" must be cut and repleaced by "00".

    I see in the log, that the number is received correctly "+49179" but sent false "+49179". The reason is the a later rule matches which formats the number on a false way.

    Has somebody already had such troubles with correct but not matching rules?

    Thank you...

    I.
     
  2. AndreasP_3CX

    AndreasP_3CX New Member
    3CX Support

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    2
    This blog explains the outbound rules in good detail please go to this link and follow the instructions. it should help you set up your rules correctly http://www.3cx.com/blog/voip-howto/outbound-rules-a-complete-example/
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Roman.Stryuk

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi 3cxisti,

    Have you found some solution for this problem? As far as the article mentioned above does not provide any example for the numbers leaded with "+".

    Thanks!
     
  4. leejor

    leejor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    11,084
    Likes Received:
    325
    I believe it has to do with the implementation of E164.

    have a look over this... http://www.3cx.com/forums/outbound-rules-with-solved-16569.html#p84305
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.