Dismiss Notice
We would like to remind you that we’re updating our login process for all 3CX forums whereby you will be able to login with the same credentials you use for the Partner or Customer Portal. Click here to read more.

SPA8800 vs SN4114

Discussion in '3CX Phone System - General' started by nubi, Jan 13, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nubi

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2015
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello

    i want buy a new SIP-Gateway (FXO).
    Now i have the Cisco SPA232D, but the device crashes sometimes. So the idea is to replace it.

    I found this two products:

    Cisco SPA8800 (4xFXO, 4xFXS)
    Patton SmartNode SN4114/JO/EUI (4xFXO)

    Which one has the better compability with the 3CX System?

    Thanks
     
  2. CentrexJ

    CentrexJ Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    75
    The Patton.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. lneblett

    lneblett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    65
    In theory, they should be equally compatible; but at least the Patton is an officially supported device and one that has templates for provisioning. Patton support is also very good,

    The SPA8800, as noted, has the added functionality of the FXS ports, so the comparison may not be fair if that functionality is needed.

    There may also be a cost differential, but am uncertain on this point.

    If it were me, and I only needed the FXO aspect, I would go Patton.
     
  4. nubi

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2015
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank You!

    I will buy the Patton.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.