Dismiss Notice
We would like to remind you that we’re updating our login process for all 3CX forums whereby you will be able to login with the same credentials you use for the Partner or Customer Portal. Click here to read more.

What's your preferred installation method?

Discussion in '3CX Phone System - General' started by RodSlinger, Apr 13, 2017.

?

Which install have you found that works best. Reliable and best call quality.

  1. Dedicated Debain/3CX box.

    1 vote(s)
    16.7%
  2. Dedicated Windows/3CX box.

    3 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. Virtualized Debian/3CX

    2 vote(s)
    33.3%
  4. Virtualized Windows/3CX

    1 vote(s)
    16.7%
  5. Cloud instance

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Non dedicated physical install on your server or other office hardware. Shared resource.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RodSlinger

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm testing this out and so far have installed using the Debian/3CX iso on a Hyper-V VM inside Windows Server 2012r2. I haven't yet tried to install it directly on the server core or on the VM for the domain controller.

    My first VM was set running two processors and 2048mb of RAM. I only had four users for testing but did encounter a kernel panic this morning and it noted it ran out of memory. I upped the RAM for 4096 to see how it changed things.

    For others out there that have tried more than one variation, which one seemed to work the best for you?

    Dedicated box with Debian/3CX, dedicated Windows box, Debain VM or Windows VM?

    Thanks for your input.
     
  2. bdarcyevans

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    3
    We're using a Windows virtual machine in production that's been very stable. At the time we deployed Debian was not an option. Would be interested in hearing from others, particularly those that have or are planning on moving from Windows to Debian.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.