- Joined
- Sep 13, 2021
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 5
Hi everyone,
I’m looking for assistance or clarification regarding an issue with the 3CX Linux repositories. For the past 24+ hours, the Debian repo has been returning errors that prevent package retrieval, installation, or upgrades.
I am unable to install 3CX on either Debian 11 or Debian 12 because the repository is returning a clearsigned file error with the message “NOSPLIT”, which appears to indicate an invalid signature or a corrupted Release/InRelease file.
Err: http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bullseye InRelease Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NOSPLIT' (does the network require authentication?)
E: The repository 'http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bullseye InRelease' is not signed
The same happens for Bookworm.
http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bookworm
The repository was working for me up until yesterday afternoon.
I can reach the server via HTTP(S), but the Release/InRelease file appears invalid or corrupted. The SBC repository (repo.3cx.com/3cx) is also intermittently returning GPG key errors unless removed.
Everything points to a problem with the repository metadata/signature rather than my environment.
My 3CX v18 license expires on December 1st.
I planned to migrate to a new v20 installation on Debian 11/12, but currently the repo failure makes this impossible.
The ISO installer works fine on-prem, but I also need the ability to install on Azure.
Any official guidance or confirmation would be greatly appreciated so I can plan my production upgrade path before December 1st.
Thank you in advance.
— Andrew
I’m looking for assistance or clarification regarding an issue with the 3CX Linux repositories. For the past 24+ hours, the Debian repo has been returning errors that prevent package retrieval, installation, or upgrades.
I am unable to install 3CX on either Debian 11 or Debian 12 because the repository is returning a clearsigned file error with the message “NOSPLIT”, which appears to indicate an invalid signature or a corrupted Release/InRelease file.
Environment
- Debian 11 (Bullseye) and Debian 12 (Bookworm) tested
- Azure VM (production PBX)
- Local Hyper-V test VM
- Same result across multiple networks (office, home, mobile hotspot)
- No proxy, no SSL inspection
- Problem confirmed via curl -I and apt-get
Error Output
Err: http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bullseye InRelease Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NOSPLIT' (does the network require authentication?)
E: The repository 'http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bullseye InRelease' is not signed
The same happens for Bookworm.
http://downloads.3cx.com/downloads/3cxpbx bookworm
The repository was working for me up until yesterday afternoon.
I can reach the server via HTTP(S), but the Release/InRelease file appears invalid or corrupted. The SBC repository (repo.3cx.com/3cx) is also intermittently returning GPG key errors unless removed.
What I Have Already Tried
- Multiple Debian versions (11 and 12)
- Different Azure VM sizes and generations
- Local Hyper-V VMs to rule out Azure network
- Switching between downloads.3cx.com and downloads-global.3cx.com
- Removing and re-adding the GPG key
- Forcing apt to ignore expiration (Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false)
- Testing via curl -I (no proxy, no packet modification)
- Reinstalling from scratch (same error immediately after adding repo)
Everything points to a problem with the repository metadata/signature rather than my environment.
Why This Is Time-Critical
My 3CX v18 license expires on December 1st.
I planned to migrate to a new v20 installation on Debian 11/12, but currently the repo failure makes this impossible.
The ISO installer works fine on-prem, but I also need the ability to install on Azure.
Questions
- Is this a known issue with the 3CX Debian repositories?
- Is there an ETA for when the repository metadata/signatures will be fixed?
- Is there a temporary alternative repo or mirror that can be used?
- Is the Debian repo intentionally blocked or deprecated? (Just confirming.)
- Does 3CX recommend installing via ISO only at this time?
Any official guidance or confirmation would be greatly appreciated so I can plan my production upgrade path before December 1st.
Thank you in advance.
— Andrew