- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 28
We created a batch of users.
Some of them at the top of the organizational level are listed as "Hide from Contacts."
When I log into the normal web client as a regular user with no special roles, that user can see the status AND the extension number of the users who are marked as "Hide from Contacts."
If I go to the Department settings, I can uncheck the box to "Publish department information to all extensions," and this will hide the leadership. But, it hides EVERYONE in the Department.
What we want to accomplish is to effectively hide all the users marked as "Hide from Contacts" while still publishing Department information in general for the rest of the team members.
How is this accomplished in 3CX?
I suppose that at worst, we would create a secondary group (Leaders1, Leaders2) and put the whole team in Leaders2 so they can see each other's Presence and then only put the assistants to the leaders in Leaders1 and publish that Department to the rest of the system. Surely there's a better way to do this?
Some of them at the top of the organizational level are listed as "Hide from Contacts."
When I log into the normal web client as a regular user with no special roles, that user can see the status AND the extension number of the users who are marked as "Hide from Contacts."
If I go to the Department settings, I can uncheck the box to "Publish department information to all extensions," and this will hide the leadership. But, it hides EVERYONE in the Department.
What we want to accomplish is to effectively hide all the users marked as "Hide from Contacts" while still publishing Department information in general for the rest of the team members.
How is this accomplished in 3CX?
I suppose that at worst, we would create a secondary group (Leaders1, Leaders2) and put the whole team in Leaders2 so they can see each other's Presence and then only put the assistants to the leaders in Leaders1 and publish that Department to the rest of the system. Surely there's a better way to do this?

