- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey there,
Looking to optimize my first 3CX implementation. Given the scenario below, would my best bet be to configure the phones as a local device, or use the builtin remote/VPN option in 3CX/on the phones, or go with the existing VPN tunnels between gateway/routers?
Call quality is currently ok, but could probably still improve a bit. Have a few registration issues on some phones. They register/unregister over and over. It's hard to predict, and doesn't happen daily.
Setup:
-Phone server at site 1 (hosted), no phones here. ".5" subnet.
-50 phones 100 miles away at site 2. All Yealink VP530. ".3" subnet.
-15 phones 100 miles away at site 3. Yealink VP530. ".6" subnet
-3 phones 100 miles away at site 4. Yealink T38. ".7" subnet
-3 phones 100 miles away at site 5. Yealink T38. ".8" subnet
-Remote sites tunnel to both the main remote site ".3", and the hosted site, ".5".
Thanks!
Jim
Looking to optimize my first 3CX implementation. Given the scenario below, would my best bet be to configure the phones as a local device, or use the builtin remote/VPN option in 3CX/on the phones, or go with the existing VPN tunnels between gateway/routers?
Call quality is currently ok, but could probably still improve a bit. Have a few registration issues on some phones. They register/unregister over and over. It's hard to predict, and doesn't happen daily.
Setup:
-Phone server at site 1 (hosted), no phones here. ".5" subnet.
-50 phones 100 miles away at site 2. All Yealink VP530. ".3" subnet.
-15 phones 100 miles away at site 3. Yealink VP530. ".6" subnet
-3 phones 100 miles away at site 4. Yealink T38. ".7" subnet
-3 phones 100 miles away at site 5. Yealink T38. ".8" subnet
-Remote sites tunnel to both the main remote site ".3", and the hosted site, ".5".
Thanks!
Jim