3CX V20 Bridge Trunk Sip to Slave Direct Forwarding

[Alle CTEC]

I have 2 exchanges in the bridge, the telephone numbers arrive on the master exchange, the slave does not have telephone numbers. with V20 is it possible to forward calls from some telephone numbers directly to the extensions/groups of the slave control unit without forwarding them to fictitious users?

 

[leejor]

Are you doing this currently on version 18?

Is it a question of, can you forward a call over a bridge trunk, or can you restrict the forwarding to certain numbers.

The latter should be do-able using outbound rules, but depending on what you want to restrict, could involve a lot of rules.

 

[Alle CTEC]

I have an internal master pbx 7XXX and a slave pbx 6XXX
the power plants are on bridge. The public numbering is only on the Master PBX +XX 05XX 6XXXXXX ok now is it possible for the Master PBX to forward an inbound call directly to a 6XXX extension?

Currently there are 7XXX fictitious extensions with the 6XXX extension or group paired as a mobile phone with the paired cell phone ring option active.

 

[leejor]

If one PBX can call the extensions on the other, then they should also be able to forward calls. That ability relies on your outbound rules to be set-up correctly. If you want to block forwarding to only some of the extensions on the other PBX, and there is no extension numbering pattern, that allows a "catch all' blocking rule, then you are stuck creating a restriction rule for each extension number., unfortunately.

 

[Alle CTEC]

It is a control unit that I inherited and I can confirm that it works correctly by setting the extension number directly in the incoming rules

 

[leejor]

Perhaps you can provide a bit more detail on the issue you are having, or exactly what you are trying to achieve, that isn't working at present.

 

[Alle CTEC]

On the master pbx where the numbers arrive, extensions have been created, for example 8090 with associated mobile phone 9090, internal to the Slave PBX, always make the associated mobile phone ring. The incoming number was forwarded to the 8090 which obviously made the 9090 ring. By doing this, however, I have a fictitious extension for each extension that I have to forward. I changed the entry rule from forward to an internal number to forward to an external number 9090 and I verified the calls come in perfectly and from the Master pbx they are transferred to the Slave PBX perfectly. Thanks

Since it is a configuration that I inherited and I do not have exchanges with the same configuration, the master that forwards external calls to the slave, I was wondering if it was not possible to directly forward the call without going through a fictitious extension of the Master exchange. It does not change much because in fact you create a hidden user in the address book with a paired mobile phone, if you want you can also confine it to a specific group that does not transmit presence status, but I think it is more correct to forward the call directly to the Slave PBX

Thank you very much for the support