- Joined
- Aug 24, 2019
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 19
Hi All,
We have a 3CX customer that wants to be able to receive Direct SIP calls.
The 3CX server is working fine, and has been for some years. It is fully updated and on the latest Version 18.0 (Build 461), running on Debian on-premises.
We have turned on the option in 3CX (under Network - FQDN) and set the Local SIP Domain to be the same as the FQDN (clientname.my3cx.nz).
The customer uses a non-standard port for SIP (35060) as their ISP doesn't allow incoming connections to 5060 (I believe they sell their own VOIP service and reserve 5060 for that, but our customer does not use the ISPs service at all - they have a register based account with a SIP Trunk Provider). The FQDN resolves fine, and if I telnet to the FQDN on port 35060, something answers, so I am guessing there is no firewall issue (the firewall checker is green).
I have added a SIP ID to a test extension 001 ('admin').
I have tried testing by adding a contact in my phone (Android) as follows:
[email protected]:35060
and also
[email protected]:35060
but my phone just shows 'Calling' - it never actually connects through to 3CX.
Just in case, I also tried on the 'Secure SIP' point (35061 in this case), but still nothing.
I have turned up the logging level to 'verbose', purged, tried calling in, and then searched for anything with the IP address I am calling from, but nothing shows at all. Not sure if that means anything?
I guess it is possible that the issue is with my phone (Android), rather than 3CX. To confirm whether that is the case, is there any sip destination test service that I can call from my phone to make sure that works? Similarly, is there anything out there (website maybe) that allows you to call a sip address to do a test? I have searched via Google, but haven't found anything so far - maybe I am not searching for the right things and / or I am not recognising something that would do either of those tests though.
Any suggestions welcome, and I am happy to re-confirm any settings you think I might have gotten wrong.
Thanks,
Alan.
We have a 3CX customer that wants to be able to receive Direct SIP calls.
The 3CX server is working fine, and has been for some years. It is fully updated and on the latest Version 18.0 (Build 461), running on Debian on-premises.
We have turned on the option in 3CX (under Network - FQDN) and set the Local SIP Domain to be the same as the FQDN (clientname.my3cx.nz).
The customer uses a non-standard port for SIP (35060) as their ISP doesn't allow incoming connections to 5060 (I believe they sell their own VOIP service and reserve 5060 for that, but our customer does not use the ISPs service at all - they have a register based account with a SIP Trunk Provider). The FQDN resolves fine, and if I telnet to the FQDN on port 35060, something answers, so I am guessing there is no firewall issue (the firewall checker is green).
I have added a SIP ID to a test extension 001 ('admin').
I have tried testing by adding a contact in my phone (Android) as follows:
[email protected]:35060
and also
[email protected]:35060
but my phone just shows 'Calling' - it never actually connects through to 3CX.
Just in case, I also tried on the 'Secure SIP' point (35061 in this case), but still nothing.
I have turned up the logging level to 'verbose', purged, tried calling in, and then searched for anything with the IP address I am calling from, but nothing shows at all. Not sure if that means anything?
I guess it is possible that the issue is with my phone (Android), rather than 3CX. To confirm whether that is the case, is there any sip destination test service that I can call from my phone to make sure that works? Similarly, is there anything out there (website maybe) that allows you to call a sip address to do a test? I have searched via Google, but haven't found anything so far - maybe I am not searching for the right things and / or I am not recognising something that would do either of those tests though.
Any suggestions welcome, and I am happy to re-confirm any settings you think I might have gotten wrong.
Thanks,
Alan.
Last edited: