- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 18
Both sites are 3CX v16.0.1.273 Pro Linux on-site
Site-1 is central (main)
extensions: 1000-1100
bridge (master) to site-2: 10100
sip (4-line FXO): 10000
inbound rule: DIDs from 10000 get routed to ring group 8000 which includes 1000 (receptionist for site-1)
outbound route: 4-digit, beginning with 2 get routed to site-2
Site-2 is remote
extensions: 2000-2100
bridge (slave) to site-1: 10100
sip (4-line FXO): 10001
inbound rule: DIDs from 10000 get routed to ring group 8000 which includes 2000 (receptionist for site-2)
outbound route: 4-digit, beginning with 1 get routed to site-1
Each site can intercom the other. Each site can answer and call out on their local SIP trunk. My problem is that site-2 receptionist is out on extended leave and the site-2 manager (part of the ring group) is now forced to answer incoming calls. The manager has asked if incoming calls can be routed to site-1 so that the site-1 receptionists ring group can answer the calls.
I have tried changing the site-2 inbound rule forwarding from 'forward to extension 8000' to 'forward to number 1044'. ext1044 is an extension at site-1 used for testing. The incoming call fails to route to site-2 1044 because it can't find a matching local extension number. The log file reports
How to I set the site-2 inbound DID rule so that it will forward to the site-2 receptionist group 8000?
Thank you,
Site-1 is central (main)
extensions: 1000-1100
bridge (master) to site-2: 10100
sip (4-line FXO): 10000
inbound rule: DIDs from 10000 get routed to ring group 8000 which includes 1000 (receptionist for site-1)
outbound route: 4-digit, beginning with 2 get routed to site-2
Site-2 is remote
extensions: 2000-2100
bridge (slave) to site-1: 10100
sip (4-line FXO): 10001
inbound rule: DIDs from 10000 get routed to ring group 8000 which includes 2000 (receptionist for site-2)
outbound route: 4-digit, beginning with 1 get routed to site-1
Each site can intercom the other. Each site can answer and call out on their local SIP trunk. My problem is that site-2 receptionist is out on extended leave and the site-2 manager (part of the ring group) is now forced to answer incoming calls. The manager has asked if incoming calls can be routed to site-1 so that the site-1 receptionists ring group can answer the calls.
I have tried changing the site-2 inbound rule forwarding from 'forward to extension 8000' to 'forward to number 1044'. ext1044 is an extension at site-1 used for testing. The incoming call fails to route to site-2 1044 because it can't find a matching local extension number. The log file reports
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - Leg L:151.1[Line:10001<<1234567890] is terminated: Cause: BYE from PBX
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - [CM503020]: Call(C:151): Normal call termination. Call originator: Line:10001<<1234567890. Reason: Not found
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - [CM503014]: Call(C:151): No known route from Line:10001<<1234567890 to target: <sip:[email protected]:5060>
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - Call(C:151): from Line:10001<<1234567890 to 1044 doesn't match any known extension number.
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - Call(C:151): from Line:10001<<1234567890: Office hours override is active, now it is set to OUT of office hours
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - [CM503010]: Call(C:151): Making route(s) from Line:10001<<1234567890 to <sip:[email protected]:5060>
- 11/12/2019 12:46:24 PM - [CM500002]: Call(C:151): Info on incoming INVITE from Line:10001<<1234567890 :
How to I set the site-2 inbound DID rule so that it will forward to the site-2 receptionist group 8000?
Thank you,