- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 2
After loss of Internet connection for whatever reason (client has had 3-5 outages a month over the last 3 months), 3CX registers on port 1024 (according to SIP provider Internode in Australia) instead of 5060 and fails.
Telephony works sporadically (somehow) until deregistering 3CX for 20 minutes, allowing the active registration to timeout at the SIP provider, reregistering, then all is fine until the next outage.
The best I can determine is that the original registration remains active after an interruption until it times out after 15 minutes or so. For some reason, the 3CX system doesn't reregister to that port, but to port 1024. What I'm trying to figure out is: why 1024? Is this a 3CX thing? Or maybe a SIP provider (Internode) thing? I can't find any documentation about 3CX utilising port 1024 whatsoever.
I have another client that uses the same Internode NodePhone product but doesn't have this issue. The only other variable in the equation I can think of is that the client with the problem also uses Internode for their internet connection, whereas the client without problems uses iiNet (Internode's parent company). Ookla's Speedtest actually identifies the Internode connection as iiNet and the iiNet connection as TPG (iiNet's parent company). Bottom line is, they probably use significantly different infrastructure. Not sure if it's a factor.
Thanks in advance.
Telephony works sporadically (somehow) until deregistering 3CX for 20 minutes, allowing the active registration to timeout at the SIP provider, reregistering, then all is fine until the next outage.
The best I can determine is that the original registration remains active after an interruption until it times out after 15 minutes or so. For some reason, the 3CX system doesn't reregister to that port, but to port 1024. What I'm trying to figure out is: why 1024? Is this a 3CX thing? Or maybe a SIP provider (Internode) thing? I can't find any documentation about 3CX utilising port 1024 whatsoever.
I have another client that uses the same Internode NodePhone product but doesn't have this issue. The only other variable in the equation I can think of is that the client with the problem also uses Internode for their internet connection, whereas the client without problems uses iiNet (Internode's parent company). Ookla's Speedtest actually identifies the Internode connection as iiNet and the iiNet connection as TPG (iiNet's parent company). Bottom line is, they probably use significantly different infrastructure. Not sure if it's a factor.
Thanks in advance.