- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
After bashing my head on a problem with using Cisco SPA-3102's, I've concluded that I need new ATAs.
What I'm doing is terminating 4 POTS (analog) lines from the phone company and I need four handsets (analog) in the office. These can be thought of as completely independent, although it was convenience using both sides of the SPA-3102.
I don't care about expandability, nifty functionality (since the 3CX is doing all the heavy lifting), or anything other than basic POTS-to-3CX and 3CX-to-analog handset mediation.
The SPA-3102's have a nastly little bug that mishandles caller-id (making it useless for our application), so I'd like to understand if there are any hidden "gotchas" with any of the other terminal adapters.
The only feature I'd like is "automatic PSTN failover" (if a single device supports both the FSO/FXS). If the 3CX is down, unable to register, or the terminal adapter loses power, I'd like it to loop the incoming POTS lines to the handsets. The SPA-3102's had this capability.
Thanks,
Ron
What I'm doing is terminating 4 POTS (analog) lines from the phone company and I need four handsets (analog) in the office. These can be thought of as completely independent, although it was convenience using both sides of the SPA-3102.
I don't care about expandability, nifty functionality (since the 3CX is doing all the heavy lifting), or anything other than basic POTS-to-3CX and 3CX-to-analog handset mediation.
The SPA-3102's have a nastly little bug that mishandles caller-id (making it useless for our application), so I'd like to understand if there are any hidden "gotchas" with any of the other terminal adapters.
The only feature I'd like is "automatic PSTN failover" (if a single device supports both the FSO/FXS). If the 3CX is down, unable to register, or the terminal adapter loses power, I'd like it to loop the incoming POTS lines to the handsets. The SPA-3102's had this capability.
Thanks,
Ron