- Joined
- Apr 21, 2009
- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 0
Archi
I do NOT disagree with you, BUT SY was pushing for the problem coming from the Service Provider, where it had nothing to do with them and but for:
The phones I have (and tried) do not seem to have options for such changes/configurations, and I have tried many including the 3CX suggested. In fact the only soft-phone I have found that does is on Linux (Twinkle), but it does not have a camera facility.
I do agree that the handsets are also an obvious place to have such a facility.
I also believe and limited tests have shown that the 3CX configs can also influence displays. Having a central control would be hugely beneficial. I am NOT a techie at all, so do not understand the ins and outs of all these, but I can and do assess logically, and so far playing has shown much to be correct - if misguided.
I do NOT disagree with you, BUT SY was pushing for the problem coming from the Service Provider, where it had nothing to do with them and but for:
The phones I have (and tried) do not seem to have options for such changes/configurations, and I have tried many including the 3CX suggested. In fact the only soft-phone I have found that does is on Linux (Twinkle), but it does not have a camera facility.
I do agree that the handsets are also an obvious place to have such a facility.
I also believe and limited tests have shown that the 3CX configs can also influence displays. Having a central control would be hugely beneficial. I am NOT a techie at all, so do not understand the ins and outs of all these, but I can and do assess logically, and so far playing has shown much to be correct - if misguided.