- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1
Hello All,
As you may be afflicted with being short-staffed, I don't have the time to sink a couple hours into debugging what variable and string I need to put together to get my staff to stop crying about the verstat validation screwing up their redial, CID display, etc. You folks have a down/dirty guide for removing this from a Flowroute Trunk? Yes, I saw the "solved" article, but the resolution was it magically resolving itself (which is the non-solution). Can someone save a brother some time here? Here is the Methodology from their support (FYI, their standard response is contact the PBX for stripping the crap off):
____________________________________________
___________________________________________
Thanks,
Mark
As you may be afflicted with being short-staffed, I don't have the time to sink a couple hours into debugging what variable and string I need to put together to get my staff to stop crying about the verstat validation screwing up their redial, CID display, etc. You folks have a down/dirty guide for removing this from a Flowroute Trunk? Yes, I saw the "solved" article, but the resolution was it magically resolving itself (which is the non-solution). Can someone save a brother some time here? Here is the Methodology from their support (FYI, their standard response is contact the PBX for stripping the crap off):
____________________________________________
STIR/SHAKEN methodology with Flowroute
For inbound calls to customers, our current plan is to provide both of the following STIR/SHAKEN-based insights:- TN validation info via the ‘verstat’ tel URI, a parameter in either the P-Asserted Identity (PAI) header field or the FROM header field. This parameter will contain one of the following 3 values denoting the result of a TN validation check:
- TN-Validation-Passed
- TN-Validation-Failed
- No-TN-Validation
- If we get a "TN-Validation-Passed” result in the verstat, we will prepend “[V]” to the CNAM, right-truncating CNAM if the addition of “[V]” causes the 15-character limit to be exceeded.
- For calls that have the above-mentioned verstat result, we’re also putting logic in place that will overwrite any CNAM content that originating networks or customer’s PBX would supply, so that the pre-pended [V] doesn’t inadvertently communicate invalid/nefarious CNAM content.
- Finally if the CNAM content from our content-provider is either blank or the response is NULL, the CNAM will simply be “[V]"
- All other calls will be have normal CNAM treatment.
- We do not plan to block inbound traffic based on a STIR/SHAKEN verification result at this time
- The spirit of offering both (1) and (2) together is to allow customers who can handle/parse SIP headers to apply their own treatment, if they so choose, while also providing for others who cannot; the CNAM-based approach solves for a large variety of end-customer-device restrictions without the need for service providers to individually do so.
- Calls from TNs that a customer purchased from Flowroute, and are associated with that specific customer’s Flowroute account, should get attestation A.
- Calls from TNs other than those that a customer purchased from Flowroute, should get attestation B
- Calls from a customer whose Flowroute account is in ‘Pending’ status will get attestation C
- Calls from invalid TNs (invalid per North American Numbering Plan) or with caller ID “Anonymous” will get attestation C
- We will pass-through, unaltered, any attestation we receive on calls arriving at Flowroute.
___________________________________________
Thanks,
Mark