V14

[sean.suntelnetworks]

SuntELneTworKS

I had the same issue with Multicast paging in 12.5 and what I did to solve it was move it to a different part of the template. It seems to compile better when moved further down in the file.

Understood. Thank you. I'm just going to manually create the common cfg file going forward to avoid the template compiling issue.

 

[DenizIrde]

Here are my v14 issues now... (As a certified partner/installer)

The external leg ports show incorrectly in the Custom Parameters screen. Shows 60000 and 61000 sometimes, and other times 9000 - 9099 at other times, even though the Ports screen (under network) shows 9000-9255. WTF

This one is quite interesting and I was also suspicious on the ports, especially after restarting all the services.

Btw, in my production env. I do have only one Internet connection and the HTTP 80/443 ports are redirected to my mx server. So I've tried to change the default ports in IIS version of 3cx and I think I get success. I just added ":81" & ":444" to the URLs to the some custom parameters. My tests not yet complete to apply this config. in production.

 

[craigreilly]

Everything I see here stops me from going to v14. period.
I like the idea of an improved mobile client - but MOH, CDR, etc. UGH!

 

[tsukraw]

This week i was at the 3CX deal in Miami.
After attending the changes/cloud stuff I feel a lot better with v14.
I understand why they had to pull parts of it "for the short period"....
How they brought the cloud version and stand along version into one install is why a lot of it happened.

By the sounds of it they are aware they need to bring these features back like CDR and such.
Dont shoot the messenger but it sounds like SP1 will most likely be available before the end of the year. Could be next week most likely not.... but before the end of they year at some point most likely. Which really isn't the far off considering we are almost into October.

 

[3CXusername]

tsukraw,

Thanks for the info. I just would hope that 3CX themselves could be more transparent of feature removal going forward.

 

[craigreilly]

Agreed. Just tell us:
Temporarily removed until we iron out some bugs: CDR, ... whatever.

I don't mind change - just don't like regression.