- Joined
- Jul 24, 2021
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 16
HA installation on Raspbian Buster currently fails after step (2) when choosing "Yes" to the question "Would you like to create an SBC HA cluster?" (note that if you don't create a cluster, everything completes and works fine).
EDIT: I did follow this guide for the initial SBC install, substituting that for the step 1 in the HA installation URL above.
The key outputs from my SSH terminal screen are:
Whether right or wrong, I solved this by first running "sudo apt-get update --allow-releaseinfo-change" and then trying again.
I've added this just to help future surfers. Please mark this as "Solved" if this is the correct approach. If there is a better way to solve this then please elaborate below. Also 3CX'ers - please update online docs accordingly. Cheers.
EDIT: I did follow this guide for the initial SBC install, substituting that for the step 1 in the HA installation URL above.
The key outputs from my SSH terminal screen are:
Bash:
<<SNIP>>
warning: 3cxsbc service is running, will stop it now!
Hit:1 http://downloads-global.3cx.com/downloads/debian buster-testing InRelease
Hit:2 http://downloads-global.3cx.com/downloads/debian buster InRelease
Get:3 http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian buster InRelease [15.0 kB]
Get:4 http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian buster InRelease [32.6 kB]
Get:5 http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian buster/main armhf Packages [393 kB]
Reading package lists... Done
E: Repository 'http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian buster InRelease' changed its 'Suite' value from 'stable' to 'oldstable'
N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository can be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details.
<<SNIP>>
error: Some of prerequisites are not present. Make sure your /etc/apt/sources.list is valid.
root@xysbc01:~/downloads#
Whether right or wrong, I solved this by first running "sudo apt-get update --allow-releaseinfo-change" and then trying again.
I've added this just to help future surfers. Please mark this as "Solved" if this is the correct approach. If there is a better way to solve this then please elaborate below. Also 3CX'ers - please update online docs accordingly. Cheers.
Attachments
Last edited: