Incoming DID routing problem

[perfect-touch]

14/04/2020 22:16:26 - L:9.1[Line:10000<<0**********] got Confirmed Recv Req ACK from 77.240.48.94:5060 tid=86a7.40792644.2
[email protected]:5060:
ACK sip:[email protected]:3468 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 77.240.48.94;branch=z9hG4bK86a7.40792644.2
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 77.240.56.54:5060;branch=z9hG4bK08c02b38 Max-Forwards: 69
Contact: <sip:0**********@77.240.56.54:5060>
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=67071f36
From: "0**********" <sip:0**********@77.240.56.54>;tag=as7160c83f
Call-ID: [email protected]:5060
CSeq: 102
ACK User-Agent: VoIPGW
Content-Length: 0

Should the DID on inbound routes of 02081913876 match <sip:[email protected]>? At the moment if I create a DID rule for 02081913876 it is ignored. Does the inbound rule look for a substring match or does the "to" field have to match exactly... hopefully not the latter as I can't put '-' characters in the DID string in 3cx...!

 

[cobaltit]

https://www.3cx.com/docs/manual/inbound-did-call-routing/

 

[perfect-touch]

Thanks for the friendly slap on the wrist - I studied that article for ages and completely missed the wildcarding... d'oh!

 

[cobaltit]

No problem. I've read many articles late at night or under the gun and then re-read them later it's like it's a totally different article! But more importantly does it work now?

 

[perfect-touch]

Yes, yes it does...