Change in the Audio File Format while Downloading

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jawad Altaf

Free User
Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Hi,
I am downloading the Audio Recording from 3CX. However After Downloading, I am Receiving this Format
[Extension Name]_Extension Number-Calling Number_YmdHi(Call Duration)

I want: Extension Number to be on first in the Existing Format.

Is it possible to do that.
thnx
Regards.
 
The format will always be the same:

[CallerName]_Caller_Callee_Timestamp.wav

This will not change anytime soon and I don't know why it's important to you tho.
 
What is the reason you require this format? Depending on the situation we may be able to suggest something.
 
Dear We need below format
Caller_Callee_[CallerName]_Timestamp.wav

We need this for extraction of data for our management system which developed in java.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evolute IT
Dear We need below format
Caller_Callee_[CallerName]_Timestamp.wav

We need this for extraction of data for our management system which developed in java.
Honestly it would make the reading of the files easier lol but can't your software be adapted for the 3CX format? Or can you have a proxy script renaming it?
 
Or batch rename / move to working folder using a script?

Or, if using windows, there are GUI batch rename utilities out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evolute IT
Let us not forget that you can not simply change the file name. Doing so would make the recordings unreachable by 3CX. Rather, you would first need to COPY the recordings to a new location, then change the file name of the copy. That also implies that you would have 2 copies of the same recording thus requiring double the hard disk space.

There might be good reasons for having a second copy of the recording (for archival), and you could use the 3CX retention policy to minimize the disk space requirements. But it might be much more straightforward to change your JAVA application as suggested by @Frederick Marcoux.
 
Let us not forget that you can not simply change the file name. Doing so would make the recordings unreachable by 3CX. Rather, you would first need to COPY the recordings to a new location, then change the file name of the copy. That also implies that you would have 2 copies of the same recording thus requiring double the hard disk space.

There might be good reasons for having a second copy of the recording (for archival), and you could use the 3CX retention policy to minimize the disk space requirements. But it might be much more straightforward to change your JAVA application as suggested by @Frederick Marcoux.
OP said they were downloading the audio.
 
If the intent is to first download the file, then why have this discussion? Once you have a copy of the file you can name it anything you want. The original question was can we have 3CX save the original recording in a different format, and the answer is "no". Nor can you change the file name while at rest on the 3CX server. So the only option is to copy the file to a different location and change the name during or after the copy process. Changing the file name while it resides in the default 3CX folder will break 3CX.
 
If the intent is to first download the file, then why have this discussion? Once you have a copy of the file you can name it anything you want. The original question was can we have 3CX save the original recording in a different format, and the answer is "no". Nor can you change the file name while at rest on the 3CX server. So the only option is to copy the file to a different location and change the name during or after the copy process. Changing the file name while it resides in the default 3CX folder will break 3CX.
Perhaps we just interpreted the sentence "I am downloading the Audio Recording from 3CX" differently. I took it to mean using the admin portal to download audio recordings locally and you seem to have taken it to mean manipulate the recordings in situ on the server. I believed the OP was asking can we change the naming convention for the downloads of these files for which the answer is no, but there are alternative ways of getting these into a different naming format.

Yes, renaming the files on the server would break the links between the files and the 3CX database, although there would be nothing stopping someone using a script to create soft / symbolic links to them from an alternative location, which might be a more efficient method than copying them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
111,977
Messages
590,090
Members
164,904
Latest member
gdstratton