FXS

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaveA66

Platinum Partner
Advanced Certified
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Messages
168
Reaction score
25
Hi

I may need to install a 3CX with about 50 POTs (don't ask!)

Has anyone used a 24 port FXS module successfully?
I don't really want to fix about 12 4 port ones to the wall!

I was looking at

Patton SmartNode SN4424/JS/UI 24 FXS​


Thanks!

Dave
 
FXS is for analog phones.

You need FXO for POTS.
 
I meant POT as in analogue handset? Always thought that was FXS.
 
I meant POT as in analogue handset? Always thought that was FXS.
Then it's not POTS.

POTS is analog phone lines.

FXS is analog phones/handsets.

You just mixed them lol POTS isn't phones.

But yeah, if you need a lot of FXS, go with a Patton supported model or Grandstream (16, 24, 32, 48-ports).

1623422063757.png
 
Technically both FXS and FXO are POTS. An easy way to think about it is FXS is hot or "Shocking", it has voltage. FXO is not hot, or "Off". I learned it that way decades ago and it always stuck with me. It can otherwise get confusing when you have gateways/adapters that have both FXS and FXO ports. I think this document explains it perfectly:

https://www.3cx.com/pbx/fxs-fxo/

Not that I think it would be safe to stick your tongue on an FXO port (or any port) to see if it shocks you. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evolute IT
I meant POT as in analogue handset? Always thought that was FXS.
Is this for a hotel? If so, go with the Grandstream FXS device not the Patton as it supports both methods of MWI light method. Last time I looked into this the Patton only supports MWI if the phone is powered with a cable but the Grandstream can send an unpowered phone the MWI indicator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evolute IT
Technically both FXS and FXO are POTS.
Well...technically, POTS refers to a service, as in Plain Old Telephone Service, that you would subscribe to, from your local PSTN provider, it really has nothing to do with the instruments/devices themselves.

The terms FXO and FXS came about from the time when telephone companies offered Foreign Exchange (FX) services. Long before number porting, if someone wanted to pay for a telephone number from a different exchange, outside their normal service area, it had to be run from one central office to another, then to the subscriber. The equipment at the originating office was referred to as FXO (with O for Office, or Originating) and at the Subscriber (or Set) end... FXS. In the last 60 years or so, this equipment was usually made up of channel bank cards, but there were many ways of doing this depending on the method of transport. They can still used for things like analogue DID lines (yes, some people still use them), with the FXO at the customer end, and the FXS going to a trunk circuit card, or special line card, on the central office switch.
The terms simply continued to be used as we transitioned to VoIP, as they were easy to understand.
 
Last edited:
I was referring to POT (no S, so no service)
In the UK us (old school) engineers have always used POT (plain old telephone) as a device.
Yes agrees POTS is a service, a POT is not :)
 
Thanks for the tip!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.