- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello,
we are already using 3CX, but we are looking into changing it from ISDN to VOIP. The reason behind is that we would like to "turn" the cost of ISDN connections and hardware into using better internet connection, while also improving the functionality of the 3CX software.
We have a following setup: we reside in Austria, while or RDS Server are located in Germany, and we connect there with Citrix. Our internet connection is currently DSL 18/18. We currently have 10 ISDN connections, and we use a Beronet Module to connect the 3CX system to the ISDN connections. 3CX server and desk phones are located internally, while there is also a 3CX app running on the RDS server. The datacenter where our RDS resides and our office are connected via Site-to-Site tunnel. Different networks, but they "talk" to each other.
Important for us is that we use a CRM software that integrates with 3CX, so we can click on telephone numbers in the CRM software, and our phone dials automatically. We know it should also be able to show the name of the caller, but that's currently not possible in the current setup. We do miss that feature, and we were told were we to have pure VOIP (as one would have when RDS servers are located internally), 3CX would fully integrate with our CRM software.
The problem with this setup however is, if I understand the VOIP concept correctly, that the signal would travel double way, since we would have to use a sip trunk of some provider in Austria. Meaning: the signal would travel first to our RDS server in Germany, and then back to the provider, where it would go "out"... is that correct?
Is that a viable concept, and would it work, or would we have latency problems? I would report what the current latency is, but we are currently on our backup line (LTE), as our DSL is having problems.
We would also consider changing our DSL to fiber optic, which would of course improve latency, but still, the double way still exists.
We would also like to manage our costs by ourselves, meaning pay 3CX directly for the license, to the provider for the siptrunk/minutes, buy our phones... we still have to put all costs on the table and make a comparison, but the feeling is that we could turn the cost pretty well.
Can someone provide some insight in the matter?
Thank you.
we are already using 3CX, but we are looking into changing it from ISDN to VOIP. The reason behind is that we would like to "turn" the cost of ISDN connections and hardware into using better internet connection, while also improving the functionality of the 3CX software.
We have a following setup: we reside in Austria, while or RDS Server are located in Germany, and we connect there with Citrix. Our internet connection is currently DSL 18/18. We currently have 10 ISDN connections, and we use a Beronet Module to connect the 3CX system to the ISDN connections. 3CX server and desk phones are located internally, while there is also a 3CX app running on the RDS server. The datacenter where our RDS resides and our office are connected via Site-to-Site tunnel. Different networks, but they "talk" to each other.
Important for us is that we use a CRM software that integrates with 3CX, so we can click on telephone numbers in the CRM software, and our phone dials automatically. We know it should also be able to show the name of the caller, but that's currently not possible in the current setup. We do miss that feature, and we were told were we to have pure VOIP (as one would have when RDS servers are located internally), 3CX would fully integrate with our CRM software.
The problem with this setup however is, if I understand the VOIP concept correctly, that the signal would travel double way, since we would have to use a sip trunk of some provider in Austria. Meaning: the signal would travel first to our RDS server in Germany, and then back to the provider, where it would go "out"... is that correct?
Is that a viable concept, and would it work, or would we have latency problems? I would report what the current latency is, but we are currently on our backup line (LTE), as our DSL is having problems.
We would also consider changing our DSL to fiber optic, which would of course improve latency, but still, the double way still exists.
We would also like to manage our costs by ourselves, meaning pay 3CX directly for the license, to the provider for the siptrunk/minutes, buy our phones... we still have to put all costs on the table and make a comparison, but the feeling is that we could turn the cost pretty well.
Can someone provide some insight in the matter?
Thank you.