- Joined
- Jun 18, 2021
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 4
Hi,
I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour (to me) when defining outbound rules using "+" prefix.
I defined an outbound rule,
"Calls to numbers starting with prefix" 5,
Route 1, route it to a test-trunk, strip of 1 digit.
This works as expected.
51000 gets the correct response (reports time in the test-trunk)
I now define another outbound rule, exactly the same as above, but replaced 5 with "+".
Now it behaves kind of weird.
It says "route not registered".
I do have a 1000 extension inside my PBX that's not registered.
But why is the 3CX client treating "+" as a call to my local extension instead of going out through the "+" outbound rule?
thx
kenneth
I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour (to me) when defining outbound rules using "+" prefix.
I defined an outbound rule,
"Calls to numbers starting with prefix" 5,
Route 1, route it to a test-trunk, strip of 1 digit.
This works as expected.
51000 gets the correct response (reports time in the test-trunk)
I now define another outbound rule, exactly the same as above, but replaced 5 with "+".
Now it behaves kind of weird.
It says "route not registered".
I do have a 1000 extension inside my PBX that's not registered.
But why is the 3CX client treating "+" as a call to my local extension instead of going out through the "+" outbound rule?
thx
kenneth

