- Joined
- May 20, 2025
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
I have created a bridge between two 3cx systems and the slave is seeing presence information from the master, but the master is not seeing any presence information from the slave.
Despite this, the bridge is showing as active on both systems and calls are working fine in both directions.
Of particular note, the bridge is configured to use a tunnel. However, the tunnel's SBC does not reside on the slave's machine. Instead it resides on a different machine on the slave's local network. I suspect this may be the problem as, on the master's activity logs, nothing is reported, but on the slave's activity log I am seeing the following warning message: "Registration at YP bridge has failed. Destination (sip:127.0.0.1:5080;lr) is not reachable, DNS error resolving FQDN, or service is not available." which is why I suspect that the problem may relate to the SBC being on a different machine.
Does anyone know if it is a requirement to have the SBC installed on the slave machine, or whether it is possible to configure the slave to have it connect to port 5080 on an IP other than 127.0.0.1, and also whether this is the likely cause of the missing presence information?
I have checked numerous sources to verify that my configuration is correct and, as mentioned above, the bridge does work fine apart from the slave's presence status not reaching the master. I have also not found any documentation indicating a need for the SBC to reside on the same machine as the slave 3cx. But, at the same time, I'm struggling to work out how the slave system goes about finding the local SBC machine in order to establish the bridge, which it seems to be doing successfully! In each system's bridge configuration, I have the "Remote PBX IP" set to the FQDN of the other system, the "Remote PBX port" set to 5090 and the "Remote PBX uses Tunnel" option checked.
Despite this, the bridge is showing as active on both systems and calls are working fine in both directions.
Of particular note, the bridge is configured to use a tunnel. However, the tunnel's SBC does not reside on the slave's machine. Instead it resides on a different machine on the slave's local network. I suspect this may be the problem as, on the master's activity logs, nothing is reported, but on the slave's activity log I am seeing the following warning message: "Registration at YP bridge has failed. Destination (sip:127.0.0.1:5080;lr) is not reachable, DNS error resolving FQDN, or service is not available." which is why I suspect that the problem may relate to the SBC being on a different machine.
Does anyone know if it is a requirement to have the SBC installed on the slave machine, or whether it is possible to configure the slave to have it connect to port 5080 on an IP other than 127.0.0.1, and also whether this is the likely cause of the missing presence information?
I have checked numerous sources to verify that my configuration is correct and, as mentioned above, the bridge does work fine apart from the slave's presence status not reaching the master. I have also not found any documentation indicating a need for the SBC to reside on the same machine as the slave 3cx. But, at the same time, I'm struggling to work out how the slave system goes about finding the local SBC machine in order to establish the bridge, which it seems to be doing successfully! In each system's bridge configuration, I have the "Remote PBX IP" set to the FQDN of the other system, the "Remote PBX port" set to 5090 and the "Remote PBX uses Tunnel" option checked.

